Morale Della Storia

[ad_1]

Let’s start with the bottom up: We’ll start with the conclusion and details later. It is a rather unusual practice in English journalism, but this imperfection is desired here to warn readers of the improvisation of arguments, which is a driving force for inverting reasoning. As witnesses to history, we go backwards to the past, as citizens of the country and as humans, to examine events and historical realities. Can we learn about other people, nations, or anything else, without going into the past? Clarity on important national issues is also linked and intertwined with the past. In other words, it is impossible to appreciate or understand important national events without mentioning past history. To move forward, you need to retreat first. Let’s go back to the moral of the story. It is shameful to personally submit an idea, concept, concept, ideology, or specific political leadership. If such submission leads to the loss of personal integrity – the loss of balance between rationality and intellectual balance will undermine all common sense, and the fundamentals of proper political action. I was always surprised that the stubbornness of Pakistan’s national political party, gaining enormous popularity among the masses at one time, was founded by someone other than Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, could have handed over the reins of this political machine to people in the strange production of handwritten paper. But the more important question is: Does Democracy on Earth give democratic political structures the right to establish genetic hierarchies? In fact, in a democratic sense, this kind of thing is unheard of. Still, that’s true. It happened in Pakistan surprisingly incredibly. Not only that, it’s happening again – in particular, two major political parties, the PPP and the PML-N, happening repeatedly without any serious challenges or horrific opposition to it. Bhutto actively promoted his daughter Benazir as the party’s successor and leader, as if the People’s Party and Pakistan were the privilege of the late PPP leader. Benazir is said to have handed over his leadership to Asif Ali Zardari with handwritten paper napkins. And now, apparently, Zardari has unilaterally handed over the leadership to his son, Virawal. Sadly, unfortunately, this undemocratic practice is heartfelt support from former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, who has been disqualified. The promotion of dynasty’s rule appears to be an important element of Nawaz’s future political planning and landscape. He has already unilaterally promoted his daughter Mariam as the de facto leader of the party. The absurdity of this situation is that Nawaz is not inconsistent with democratic principles in his dynasty-planned political nature. Two major political parties have devised this future for our “democratic” Pakistan. And it appears that some people are loyal to Nawaz and Zardari, who are each loyal to them, have bought the idea of ​​domination of this family. After all, perceptual management is a reality in our time. I know who propagandists have the abilities. As everyone knows, the US public relations company in Washington has convinced Nawaz that his political comeback in Pakistan is within reach of the reach of the massive fee payments. In mind, the establishment of this PR was recommended to Nawaz other than Zardari, who is currently seeking to negotiate yet another NRO for himself and his family with false indifference and shameful unjust uncruel prudence. All of these Pakistani political actors seem to view the Pakistani masses as flocks of sheep and crowds of fools. I think they can get away with anything. The real problem in this regard lies in the prominent stubborns of both PPP and PMLN. Let’s start by examining the political behavior of some of the major political actors of the PPP. Naturally, I have questioned political wisdom, and have questioned the democratic principles of famous and talented constitutional lawyers, the prominent leader of the long-standing PPP, the former Minister of Justice, the leader of the movement for the restoration of honorable judges during the Mushalaf era, the famous innovative writer, the poet poet, his bones. A reasonable and legitimate question to ask him is why is the honorable senator and constitutional law expert Democrat standing behind Bilawal? Have the respected senator seen a blatant violation of democratic principles in solidarity with advances in genetic leadership? How do senators justify this unique political action? It is the subversion of democracy and a means of promoting anti-democratic structures and culture in Pakistani politics. The more important question is, why are Senators not challenging this brand of Zardari politics and leadership in party elections? Certainly, the senators are well qualified, competent and perhaps popular to try it. The key question is, democratically speaking, what is hindering him? Similarly, among many other long-time party stubborns, Qamar Zaman Kaira and Sherry Rehman have not challenged party leadership and continue their alliance of permanent subversion of the basic democratic contract by supporting inheritance leaders in key political parties. It’s time for someone in the PPP to take the first step against the excesses of personalized politics and thrive democratic values. Pakistani politics and society already suffered sufficient Zardari damage. It’s enough and you need to finish it now. Someone within the party needs to tell the former president and co-chair of the party that his time is being spent, and neither does he need his protégé and the chair of the designated party. The PPP and its workers are now awakening from their sleep, and so are the Pakistani masses. PML-N is even more irrelevant to modern politics. Instead of presenting the necessary legal evidence to the courts and the state, Punja Blions unleashed the Punja Blions to find comfort through meaningless monologue to the Supreme Court and state institutions, including the military facilities. The problem is simple. Tell the courts and the state how you have accumulated such large wealth. In this way, it is expected that you have misused your political power sufficiently for unauthorized economic benefits. In political terms it is defined as corruption. This is essentially a democratic distribution and regulations point. There are no two opinions on this subject. Anywhere, it is a place with ideology or any form of government. The question is how Pakistan can survive in corrupt dynasty political leadership on both sides of the coin. The moral of the story is that it cannot be done. It was released on the Express Tribune on October 27th, 2017. Like opinions and editorials on Facebook, follow @etoped on Twitter to receive all updates of all daily pieces.

[ad_2]